![]() Maybe because I'm German and there's very little fuss made about nudity over here*, which in turn makes me very confident it's just a cultural thing. > Hands are completely different than genitals.Ĭompletely? Yeah, I don't see it. I recall some high profile “shooting” even involved some president showing an example of how all good citizens should consume that content in front of TV screens. It is simply logistically impossible to create that much, not to mention that criminals are not in a hurry to film themselves.Īs for “shootings” (an American term for media spectacle in which murders are just seeds), many of those have been causally televised for entertainment purposes. However, you got used to cheap thrills coming from stories about “horrors out there” (whether digitally far away in some “darknet”, or geographically, in some “third world country”), and your imagination has already drawn you a picture of countless maniacs recreating slasher movie scenes (“life imitates art”?). Regular person seeing that content for weeks only gets bored, and probably realizes that regular adult exploitation in entertainment is hardly any different (both meanings of “adult” here), which is actually a good development. I know we've all been going in a strange direction, but a naked body is still not a “traumatizing experience”. Most likely with an ever-growing flood of selfies recently. Obviously, I can't study the whole database, and give percentages, but in practice most “images of CSAM” are either semi-professional or amateur photos of naked kids and teens in studio or home environments. > I wish my head could forget what my eyes have seen. One of the firefighters in that documentary says, sitting, emotionally exhausted and eyes shallow from a long night, or career: There's a good documentary about the rebirth of Detroit, which was for a long time the number one city for arson in the world, called "Burn" (incidentally financed/championed by Denis Leary). I'd say those are the reasons for most EMS and Fire PTSD. The horrible accidents that are no-one's fault, but will rack someone with guilt for the rest of their lives. The worst calls are generally the tragic, the emotional abuse. ![]() We stop bleeding, put (some) things back where they belong, and try to replace what has been lost (fluids), etc. When it comes down to it, we're all just tissue and blood. It's generally assumed that it's the most gruesome call. Do you go around to other people in your life on social occasions to ask them to relive unpleasant events for your curiosity? It's funny how often we get asked "what's the worst call you've ever been on?" which, when you think about it, is a strange question to ask. If we need to train models on this type of content to make it easier to detect and remove, to prevent mentally scarring people, then personally I'm all for it - regardless of the "it can also generate that bad content" cost. ![]() This is the exact type of content that I think AI is so crucial for detecting, and it's a bit sad that we often hear so about all the bad things you can generate with AI and so little about all the good. It's unfortunate the world is a messed up place, and maybe it will stay that way as long as humans are around. Seeing the worst output of humanity non-stop can (and _will_) completely break you mentally if consumed at a sufficient amount, as we are at the end of the day humans. It's not just NSFW, but also NSFL content that I think is under discussed at times. Gore, violence (physical/mental), terrorism, death, destruction, shock content, etc. ![]() A lot of attention gets paid to sex abuse content, which it should, but there is much less I feel for all sorts of other abhorrent content.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |